KNAPIC v. LUCAS ENTERTAINMENT, INC., 2:16-cv-00290-MWF-JPR. (2016)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20160727a65
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND ORDER MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Kristina Knapic filed a complaint for Fraud; Conversion; negligent Interference with a Prospective Economic Advantage; Negligence; Trespass to Land; Breach of Contract; and Unjust Enrichment; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants Michael Lucas, Lucas Entertainment, Inc., and Lucas Distribution, Inc. ("Defendants") settled this matter on or about June 22, 2016; THEREFORE, IT IS HER
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND ORDER MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff Kristina Knapic filed a complaint for Fraud; Conversion; negligent Interference with a Prospective Economic Advantage; Negligence; Trespass to Land; Breach of Contract; and Unjust Enrichment; WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants Michael Lucas, Lucas Entertainment, Inc., and Lucas Distribution, Inc. ("Defendants") settled this matter on or about June 22, 2016; THEREFORE, IT IS HERE..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND ORDER
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff Kristina Knapic filed a complaint for Fraud; Conversion; negligent Interference with a Prospective Economic Advantage; Negligence; Trespass to Land; Breach of Contract; and Unjust Enrichment;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants Michael Lucas, Lucas Entertainment, Inc., and Lucas Distribution, Inc. ("Defendants") settled this matter on or about June 22, 2016;
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action should be dismissed without prejudice. The parties further stipulate that all parties shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
