U.S. v. McMANUS, 12-190-2. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20141015a17
Visitors: 24
Filed: Oct. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. YOHN, Jr., District Judge. AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2014, upon careful consideration of the motion for forfeiture money judgment filed by the government (Doc. No. 268), and the defendant's opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to finding forfeiture appropriate and imposing joint and several liability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court will hear argument on October 7, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. as to whether t
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM H. YOHN, Jr., District Judge. AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2014, upon careful consideration of the motion for forfeiture money judgment filed by the government (Doc. No. 268), and the defendant's opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to finding forfeiture appropriate and imposing joint and several liability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court will hear argument on October 7, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. as to whether th..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM H. YOHN, Jr., District Judge.
AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2014, upon careful consideration of the motion for forfeiture money judgment filed by the government (Doc. No. 268), and the defendant's opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART with respect to finding forfeiture appropriate and imposing joint and several liability. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court will hear argument on October 7, 2014 at 10:00 a.m. as to whether the parties should provide further briefing or the court should conduct an evidentiary hearing on the question of what amount is properly subject to forfeiture.
Source: Leagle
