Cherniak v. Trans-High Corporation, 18 Civ. 7734 (AT). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200317e14
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2020
Summary: ORDER ANALISA TORRES , District Judge . The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, ECF No. 65, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen fi
Summary: ORDER ANALISA TORRES , District Judge . The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, ECF No. 65, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen fil..
More
ORDER
ANALISA TORRES, District Judge.
The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, ECF No. 65, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within thirty days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.
Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same thirty-day period to be so-ordered by the Court. Per Rule IV(C) of the Court's Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.
In addition, the parties' joint motion to file a prior settlement agreement with redactions, as set out in ECF No. 65-1, is GRANTED. Such redactions are necessary to protect the parties' privacy interests, which outweigh the public's right of access to the limited information covered by the proposed redactions.
Any pending motions are moot. All conferences are vacated. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
