Filed: Sep. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 23, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CM/ECF SYSTEM (ECF No. 476) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Michael Ioane filed an ex parte motion to participate in the electronic filing system referred to as CM/ECF on November 3, 2016. (ECF No. 476.) That motion is still outstanding. The Court will deny the motion. Although the motion states that it is filed on behalf of both Michael Ioane and Shelly Ioane, the motion was signed only by Mr. Ioane. Ms. Ioane did not sign the
Summary: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CM/ECF SYSTEM (ECF No. 476) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Michael Ioane filed an ex parte motion to participate in the electronic filing system referred to as CM/ECF on November 3, 2016. (ECF No. 476.) That motion is still outstanding. The Court will deny the motion. Although the motion states that it is filed on behalf of both Michael Ioane and Shelly Ioane, the motion was signed only by Mr. Ioane. Ms. Ioane did not sign the ..
More
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO PARTICIPATE IN THE CM/ECF SYSTEM
(ECF No. 476)
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Ioane filed an ex parte motion to participate in the electronic filing system referred to as CM/ECF on November 3, 2016. (ECF No. 476.) That motion is still outstanding. The Court will deny the motion.
Although the motion states that it is filed on behalf of both Michael Ioane and Shelly Ioane, the motion was signed only by Mr. Ioane. Ms. Ioane did not sign the motion and did not otherwise notify the Court that she joined in the motion. Mr. Ioane, who is proceeding pro se, cannot represent Ms. Ioane on this motion, who, at the time was also proceeding pro se. See McShane v. United States, 366 F.2d 286, 288 (9th Cir. 1966) (privilege to appear without counsel is personal to the litigant); Russell v. United States, 308 F.2d 78, 79 (9th Cir. 1962) ("A litigant appearing in propria persona has no authority to represent anyone other than himself."). Further, Ms. Ioane is now represented by counsel, and her counsel has access to and participates in the electronic filing system.
Further, although Mr. Ioane was previously granted access to the Court's electronic filing system, that access was revoked upon his request that all Court communications be conducted via U.S. mail due to his incarceration at the Taft Correction Institution ("TCI") and resulting lack of access to an adequate email service. (ECF Nos. 178, 181.) Mr. Ioane is still incarcerated at TCI, and was incarcerated at TCI at the time he filed his request to again participate in the electronic filing system. He does not indicate that he now has access to an adequate email service. Instead, he requests that Ms. Ioane be authorized to use the electronic filing system to make his filings and receive service on his behalf. (ECF No. 476.) Ms. Ioane, who did not sign the request and who was, at the time of the request, also proceeding pro se, may not represent Mr. Ioane. See McShane, 366 F.2d at 288; Russell, 308 F.2d at 79.
IT IS ORDERED that the ex parte request by Michael Ioane to participate in the Court's electronic filing system (ECF No. 476) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
