In re Kashyap, 17-42523. (2018)
Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California
Number: inbco20180427873
Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM RE: TAKING MOTION OFF CALENDAR WILLIAM J. LAFFERTY, III , Bankruptcy Judge . On March 15, 2018, Wells Fargo Bank filed a Motion for Relief from Stay ("the Motion") (doc. 36). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on April 11, 2018. At the hearing, neither Debtor nor Debtor's counsel appeared timely. The Court remarked on the record at the strangeness of this fact given the small number of missed payments and an apparently very large equity cushion in the property. However, as
Summary: MEMORANDUM RE: TAKING MOTION OFF CALENDAR WILLIAM J. LAFFERTY, III , Bankruptcy Judge . On March 15, 2018, Wells Fargo Bank filed a Motion for Relief from Stay ("the Motion") (doc. 36). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on April 11, 2018. At the hearing, neither Debtor nor Debtor's counsel appeared timely. The Court remarked on the record at the strangeness of this fact given the small number of missed payments and an apparently very large equity cushion in the property. However, as D..
More
MEMORANDUM RE: TAKING MOTION OFF CALENDAR
WILLIAM J. LAFFERTY, III, Bankruptcy Judge.
On March 15, 2018, Wells Fargo Bank filed a Motion for Relief from Stay ("the Motion") (doc. 36). The Court held a hearing on the Motion on April 11, 2018. At the hearing, neither Debtor nor Debtor's counsel appeared timely. The Court remarked on the record at the strangeness of this fact given the small number of missed payments and an apparently very large equity cushion in the property. However, as Debtor was not present to contest the Motion, the Court granted the Motion. Shortly thereafter, Debtor's counsel arrived. The Court decided to continue the hearing one week, and Debtor's counsel was to reach out to Wells Fargo's counsel in the interim.
The Court held a continued hearing on April 18, 2018. At this hearing, Wells Fargo's counsel did not appear. Debtor's counsel had been unsuccessful in her efforts to communicate with Wells Fargo's counsel, and the Court had not issued a notice of continued hearing.
The Court set a continued hearing for April 25, 2018. At this hearing, neither counsel appeared. The Court assumes the parties are working things out and therefore took the matter off calendar.
Source: Leagle
