Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Washington v. Trump, 2:19-01502-BJR. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Washington Number: infdco20200203g83 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2020
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING PROHIBITION AGAINST DEFENDANTS' OBLIGATION OF FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO BE APPROPRIATED FOR NAVAL BASE KITSAP PRIOR TO A DECISION BY THIS COURT BARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN , District Judge . STIPULATION WHEREAS the State of Washington has filed this suit to enjoin Defendants' use of funds authorized to be appropriated by Congress for military construction projects, including $88.96 million in funding for construction of the Bangor Pier and Maintenance facility at Naval Ba
More

STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING PROHIBITION AGAINST DEFENDANTS' OBLIGATION OF FUNDS AUTHORIZED TO BE APPROPRIATED FOR NAVAL BASE KITSAP PRIOR TO A DECISION BY THIS COURT

STIPULATION

WHEREAS the State of Washington has filed this suit to enjoin Defendants' use of funds authorized to be appropriated by Congress for military construction projects, including $88.96 million in funding for construction of the Bangor Pier and Maintenance facility at Naval Base Kitsap (see John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Pub. L. No. 115-232, § 2201, 132 Stat. 1636 (2018));

WHEREAS the Court previously entered a Stipulated Order Establishing Briefing Schedule for Expedited Resolution of this Case and Prohibiting Defendants' Obligation of Funds Authorized to be Appropriated for Naval Base Kitsap Prior to a Decision by this Court (Dkt. # 11);

WHEREAS that Order "prohibited [Defendants] from obligating, using, or otherwise placing beyond the limits of judicial process any portion of the $88.96 million authorized to be appropriated by Congress for the Bangor Pier and Maintenance Facility prior to February 1, 2020"; and

WHEREAS the Parties agree that, to give the Court more time to prepare a final decision, this prohibition should be extended until March 1, 2020;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned counsel, that this Court should enter an order providing that:

1. Defendants are prohibited from obligating, using, or otherwise placing beyond the limits of judicial process any portion of the $88.96 million authorized to be appropriated by Congress for the Bangor Pier and Maintenance Facility prior to March 1, 2020. This prohibition is enforceable through a court order.

It is SO AGREED this 28th day of January 2020.

ORDER

Having reviewed the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendants are prohibited from obligating, using, or otherwise placing beyond the limits of judicial process any portion of the $88.96 million authorized to be appropriated by Congress for the Bangor Pier and Maintenance Facility prior to March 1, 2020. This prohibition is enforceable through a court order.

2. To facilitate expedited and efficient final resolution of this case, the Court will endeavor to issue a decision on the Parties' cross-motions for summary judgment on or before March 1, 2020.

3. In the event the Court notifies the parties that the Court is unable to issue a decision before March 1, 2020, or in the event the Court has not issued a decision by February 19, 2020, Plaintiff may move for an extension of the Order to prohibit the obligation of the funds at issue until the Court issues a decision on the cross-motions for summary judgment. In the event Plaintiff requests such an extension, Defendants may oppose Plaintiffs' motion on any and all grounds, other than on the basis that the extension should not be granted because the expected obligation date is not imminent.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer