Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. JONES, 2:13-cv-00168-JAD-GWF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150302a56 Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2015
Summary: STIPULATED ORDER AND ADDENDUM TO THE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED MARCH 11, 2014 GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Counsel for the former officers of Security Savings Bank ("Defendants"), counsel for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Security Savings Bank, Henderson, Nevada ("FDIC-R"), and counsel for non-party Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its Corporate Capacity ("FDIC-C") agree as follows: 1. The Stipulated Protective Order ("SPO") entered
More

STIPULATED ORDER AND ADDENDUM TO THE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED MARCH 11, 2014

Counsel for the former officers of Security Savings Bank ("Defendants"), counsel for the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Security Savings Bank, Henderson, Nevada ("FDIC-R"), and counsel for non-party Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in its Corporate Capacity ("FDIC-C") agree as follows:

1. The Stipulated Protective Order ("SPO") entered in this action on March 11, 2014 ("SPO") shall govern and apply to non-public documents produced by FDIC-C for use in this action.

2. Provided, however, the parties may not challenge FDIC-C's confidentiality designation of FDIC-C produced material. Therefore, the provisions of paragraphs 3 and 4 of the SPO governing disputes concerning confidentiality designations shall not apply to non-public documents and information produced by FDIC-C.

3. If FDIC-C inadvertently produces non-public documents in this action without the "Confidential" designation contemplated by paragraph 3 of the SPO, then counsel for the party seeking to utilize the documents shall affix such legend.

4. To the extent that non-public documents produced by the FDIC-C in this action are sought to be introduced publicly at trial, counsel for the Defendants will provide the FDIC-C with its exhibit list after service on opposing counsel, and use their reasonable best efforts to provide notice of their use of a document not on their exhibit list so that FDIC-C may present to the Court, if it chooses, its views regarding the confidentiality of the FDIC-C documents.

5. FDIC-C may enforce the applicable terms of the SPO with respect to non-public documents produced by FDIC-C for use in this action.

6. By entering into this Stipulated Addendum, FDIC-C is not waiving service requirements or consenting to jurisdiction over the Third-Party Complaint filed by Defendants on October 20, 2014 but as yet unserved upon FDIC-C.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer