TOBY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 6:09-cv-1972-Orl-28DAB. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120628945
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2012
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID A. BAKER, Magistrate Judge. TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 20) FILED: May 31, 2012 THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED. This Court remanded the case to the Commissioner for further administrative action, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). As explained in the papers,
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID A. BAKER, Magistrate Judge. TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein: MOTION: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 20) FILED: May 31, 2012 THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED. This Court remanded the case to the Commissioner for further administrative action, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). As explained in the papers, o..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DAVID A. BAKER, Magistrate Judge.
TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion filed herein:
MOTION: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (Doc.
No. 20)
FILED: May 31, 2012
THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion be GRANTED.
This Court remanded the case to the Commissioner for further administrative action, pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). As explained in the papers, on remand Plaintiff dismissed his original request for administrative hearing on his first application for benefits, as he was approved on a subsequent application. He now seeks, in unopposed motion, to dismiss the instant action as there is no longer a final adverse decision for this Court to review. Absent any objection, the Court finds good cause has been shown and it is respectfully recommended that the motion be granted and the matter be dismissed.
Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report within fourteen (14) days from the date of its filing shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings on appeal.
Source: Leagle
