Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Neville v. Aldridge Construction, Inc., 2:17-cv-08929-AG (AGRx). (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20191011m29 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2019
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL RONALD REAGAN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 411 WEST 4TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92701-4516 ANDREW J. GUILFORD , District Judge . Having determined defendants' motion for partial summary judgment ( see D.E. 140), and having granted the parties' Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Remaining Claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Court ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: 1. Final Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against
More

FINAL JUDGMENT

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

RONALD REAGAN FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 411 WEST 4TH STREET SANTA ANA, CA 92701-4516

Having determined defendants' motion for partial summary judgment (see D.E. 140), and having granted the parties' Joint Stipulation to Dismiss Remaining Claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Court ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows:

1. Final Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs.

2. With respect to the cast version of the M-Pile tip, defendants do not infringe claims 1-4, 6-11, 14-19, 22-27, 29, and 32-33 of U.S. Patent No. 7,914,236 ("the '236 patent").

3. With respect to the cast version of the M-Pile tip, defendants do not infringe claims 1-16, 19-22, 25-28, 31-32, 34-37, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 9,284,708 ("the '708 patent").

4. The Court retains jurisdiction over this cause and over the parties for the purposes of entering all further post-judgment orders that are just and proper.

DONE AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer