Howard v. Berryhill, 17-70-DLB. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20180209c27
Visitors: 21
Filed: Feb. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT DAVID L. BUNNING , District Judge . Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: (1) The administrative decision is AFFIRMED and judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner; (2) Plaintiff Freddy Keith Howard's Complaint (Doc. # 1) against Defendant Commissioner is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (3) Thi
Summary: JUDGMENT DAVID L. BUNNING , District Judge . Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: (1) The administrative decision is AFFIRMED and judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner; (2) Plaintiff Freddy Keith Howard's Complaint (Doc. # 1) against Defendant Commissioner is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (3) This..
More
JUDGMENT
DAVID L. BUNNING, District Judge.
Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered today, and pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
(1) The administrative decision is AFFIRMED and judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Commissioner;
(2) Plaintiff Freddy Keith Howard's Complaint (Doc. # 1) against Defendant Commissioner is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
(3) This action is STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court.
This is a final and appealable order and no just cause for delay exists.
Source: Leagle
