Leinhardt v. Milos, Inc., 1:19-cv-07591-JSR. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200123e48
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 22, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2020
Summary: PROPOSED ORDER JED S. RAKOFF , District Judge . WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a settlement in principle, and are in the process of reducing their agreement to writing; and WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to finalize their settlement papers; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The above-entitled action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. However, the Parties reserve the right to request that the Court re-open the matter no later than February 7, 2020, if the settlement is
Summary: PROPOSED ORDER JED S. RAKOFF , District Judge . WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a settlement in principle, and are in the process of reducing their agreement to writing; and WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to finalize their settlement papers; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The above-entitled action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. However, the Parties reserve the right to request that the Court re-open the matter no later than February 7, 2020, if the settlement is ..
More
PROPOSED ORDER
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to a settlement in principle, and are in the process of reducing their agreement to writing; and
WHEREAS, the Parties require additional time to finalize their settlement papers;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The above-entitled action is hereby dismissed, with prejudice. However, the Parties reserve the right to request that the Court re-open the matter no later than February 7, 2020, if the settlement is not effectuated by that date.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
