ORDER

BARRY A. BRYANT, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Charles Samuel Johnson Jr. proceeds in this action pro se and in forma pauperis pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. (ECF No. 16). Defendants have filed a Response in opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 18).

In his motion, Plaintiff seeks production of policies and procedures of the Miller County Detention Center and video of an incident which allegedly occurred on August 9, 2019. Defendants responded to the motion stating on January 16, 2020, Defendants submitted their Notice of Defendant's Disclosures to Plaintiff (ECF No. 14) indicating they produced to Plaintiff the relevant policies and procedures regarding his Complaint allegations and informed Plaintiff they were not aware of any available video. (ECF No. 18). In addition, on January 9, 2020, Defendants responded to Plaintiff's Request for Production and informed Plaintiff that video of August 9, 2019 did not exist and, therefore, could not be produced. (ECF No. 18-1, p. 1). Defendants also responded to Plaintiff's Interrogatories (ECF No. 18-2) and Second Interrogatories. (ECF No. 18-3). Finally, Defendants represent Plaintiff did not contact them and attempt to resolve this discovery dispute prior to filing the instant motion. (ECF No. 18).

Upon review of the pleadings, the Court finds Defendants have provided the relevant policies of the Miller County Detention Center to Plaintiff and have informed him that no video from August 9, 2019 exists. The Court notes Rule 34 provides for production of documents and things within "the responding party's possession, custody or control." Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Defendants cannot produce what they do not have in their possession or control. Further, Defendants cannot produce what does not exist.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (ECF No. 16) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.