Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Keith v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-01110-JAD-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181114g51 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from November 13, 2018 to December 13, 2018 . This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has been experiencing chronic migraines for over a week, which impa
More

JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ORDER (First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from November 13, 2018 to December 13, 2018. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. Counsel has been experiencing chronic migraines for over a week, which impairs her vision. Counsel also has over 75+ active matters, which requires two or more dispositive motions a week until late December. Counsel also has a Ninth Circuit brief due this week, which requires multiple levels of review. Due to Counsel's unanticipated leave and heavy workload, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly.

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer