Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BRUNSON, 06-14028-CR-MOORE/LYNCH. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. Florida Number: infdco20140916b63 Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2014
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT'S ADMISSIONS TO VIOLATIONS NUMBERS 1, 2, 5 AND 6 AS SET FORTH IN THE PETITION FOR VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE FRANK J. LYNCH, Jr., Magistrate Judge. THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard for a preliminary and final evidentiary hearing on August 22, 2014, in respect to the pending Petition Alleging Violations of Supervised Release and this Court having conducted a hearing, this Court recommends to the District Court as follows: 1. The Defendant app
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON DEFENDANT'S ADMISSIONS TO VIOLATIONS NUMBERS 1, 2, 5 AND 6 AS SET FORTH IN THE PETITION FOR VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

FRANK J. LYNCH, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

THIS CAUSE having come on to be heard for a preliminary and final evidentiary hearing on August 22, 2014, in respect to the pending Petition Alleging Violations of Supervised Release and this Court having conducted a hearing, this Court recommends to the District Court as follows:

1. The Defendant appeared before this Court on August 22, 2014, for a preliminary and final hearing in respect to a Petition Alleging Violations of Supervised Release alleging the following violations:

Violation Number 1 Violation of Mandatory Condition, by unlawfully possessing or using a controlled substance. On April 22, 2014, the defendant submitted a urine specimen which tested positive for the presence of marijuana in our local laboratory, and subsequently confirmed positive by Alere Toxicology Services Incorporated. Violation Number 2 Violation of Mandatory Condition, by unlawfully possessing or using a controlled substance. On May 16 and 20, 2014, the defendant submitted urine specimens which tested positive for the presence of marijuana in our local laboratory, and subsequently confirmed positive by Alere Toxicology Services Incorporated. Violation Number 3 Violation of Mandatory Condition, by unlawfully possessing or using a controlled substance. On June 4, 9 and 23, 2014, the defendant submitted urine specimens which tested positive for the presence of marijuana in our local laboratory, and subsequently confirmed positive by Alere Toxicology Services Incorporated. Violation Number 4 Violation of Mandatory Condition, by unlawfully possessing or using a controlled substance. On July 1, 7, 14 and 21, 2014, the defendant submitted urine specimens which tested positive for the presence of marijuana in our local laboratory, and subsequently confirmed positive by Alere Toxicology Services Incorporated. Violation Number 5 Violation of Standard Condition, by frequenting a location where controlled substances are illegally sold, used, distributed or administered. On July 31, 2014, the defendant admitted purchasing marijuana from a dealer on Avenue D and 15th Street in Fort Pierce, Florida. Violation Number 6 Violation of Standard Condition, by associating with a person engaged in criminal activity. On or about July 31, 2014, the defendant admitted to meeting with a dealer on Avenue D and 15th Street in Fort Pierce, Florida, for the purpose of purchasing marijuana.

2. After consultation with his attorney, the Defendant announced to this Court that he wished to admit Violations Numbers 1, 2, 5 and 6 as set forth in the Petition. The government announced that it agreed to dismiss Violation Numbers 3 and 4 of the Petition. This Court questioned the Defendant on the record and made certain that he understood his rights in regards to an evidentiary hearing in respect to the alleged violations. Further, the Defendant acknowledged that he understood his rights in that regard and further understands that all that will remain will be for the District Court to conduct a sentencing hearing for final disposition in this matter.

3. The possible maximum penalties which the Defendant was facing were read into the record by the government and the Defendant stated that he understood those penalties.

ACCORDINGLY, based upon the Defendant's admissions to Violations Numbers 1, 2, 5 and 6 of the Petition under oath, this Court recommends to the District Court that the Defendant be found to have violated his supervised release in respect to Violations Numbers 1, 2, 5 and 6 as set forth in the Petition and that a sentencing hearing be set at the earliest convenience of the District Court for final disposition of this matter.

The parties shall have fourteen (14) days from the date of this Report and Recommendation within which to file objections, if any, with the Honorable K. Michael Moore, the United States District Judge assigned to this case. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 59(b)(2), failure to file objections timely waives a party's right to review and bars the parties from attacking on appeal any legal rulings and factual findings contained herein.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer