Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TEREX FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. CAROLINA FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE, LLC, 3:17-cv-00417(VAB). (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Connecticut Number: infdco20171027747 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2017
Summary: RULING ON CORPORATE DEFENDANT'S APPEARANCE VICTOR A. BOLDEN , District Judge . At the October 17, 2017, telephonic status conference, counsel for Plaintiff noted that Carolina Forestry and Wildlife, LLC, the corporate defendant, had yet to appear in this case. Aaron Bumgarner, an individual defendant and appearing pro se in his personal capacity, stated that he was appearing on behalf of Carolina Forestry. He represented that he was the sole member of the limited liability corporation. L
More

RULING ON CORPORATE DEFENDANT'S APPEARANCE

At the October 17, 2017, telephonic status conference, counsel for Plaintiff noted that Carolina Forestry and Wildlife, LLC, the corporate defendant, had yet to appear in this case. Aaron Bumgarner, an individual defendant and appearing pro se in his personal capacity, stated that he was appearing on behalf of Carolina Forestry. He represented that he was the sole member of the limited liability corporation.

Limited liability corporations must be represented by licensed counsel within the Second Circuit. See Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 140 (2d Cir. 2007) (requiring sole member LLC to appear through licensed counsel); Lundstedt v. People's United Bank, No. 3:14-cv-01479 (JAM), 2015 WL 540988, at *3 (D. Conn. Feb. 10, 2015) (dismissing individual case and noting that LLC could file a renewed action only if represented by a licensed attorney).

Therefore, the Court finds that Carolina Forestry and Wildlife, LLC, has yet to appear in this matter. Carolina Forestry must find counsel and appear within 45 days. Lattanzio, 481 F.3d at 140 (granting 45 days to find counsel and appear in order to renew appeal). If they do not do so, the LLC risks default or other sanction. See generally FED. R. Civ. P. 55 (describing procedures for defaultjudgment where a party fails to plead or otherwise defend an action); U.S. Fidelity. & Guaranty Co. v. Petroleo Brasileiro S.A., 220 F.R.D. 404, 407 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (declining to enter defaultjudgment where defendants had failed to find new counsel within time period provided by court but awarding attorneys fees to the opposing party).

SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer