Catling v. York School Department, 2:19-CV-110-DBH. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20190918964
Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On August 20, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Order on Defendant's Motion to Strike/Recommended Decision on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The time within which to file objections expired on September 3, 2019, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On August 20, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Order on Defendant's Motion to Strike/Recommended Decision on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The time within which to file objections expired on September 3, 2019, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de ..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
On August 20, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Order on Defendant's Motion to Strike/Recommended Decision on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. The time within which to file objections expired on September 3, 2019, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The defendant's partial motion to dismiss is DENIED.1
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The ruling denying the motion to strike also stands because there was no objection to it under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a).
Source: Leagle
