10-892-cv, 10-919-cv In the Matter of the Application of Reuters v. For a Judgment Staying Arbitration UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals 2 for the Second Circuit, held at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan 3 United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, in the City of 4 New York, on the 18th day of November, two thousand and ten. 5 6 PRESENT: BARRINGTON D. PARKER, 7 RICHARD C. WESLEY, 8 Circuit Judges. 9 10 BARBARA S. JONES, 11 District Judge.* 12 13 14 15 In the Matter of the Application of 16 REUTERS AMERICA, LLC, 17 18 Petitioner-Appellant, 19 20 -v.- 10-892-cv, 10-919-cv 21 22 NEWSPAPER GUILD OF NEW YORK, LOCAL 3, 23 24 Respondent-Appellee. 25 26 27 28 29 * The Honorable Barbara S. Jones, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.  1 FOR APPELLANT: ANA S. SALPER, Epstein Becker & Green, 2 P.C., New York, NY. 3 4 FOR APPELLEE: HANAN B. KOLKO, Meyer, Suozzi, English & 5 Klein, P.C., New York, NY. 6 7 Appeal from the United States District Court for the 8 Southern District of New York (Stein, J.). 9 10 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED 11 AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be 12 AFFIRMED. 13 Petitioner Reuters America, LLC appeals from a judgment 14 of the United States District Court for the Southern 15 District of New York (Stein, J.) entered on March 9, 2010 16 that denied Reuters’s petition to stay two arbitration 17 proceedings with Appellee Newspaper Guild of New York, Local 18 3. We agree with the district court that the arbitration 19 clause of the parties’s latest collective bargaining 20 agreement applies here. Accordingly, the judgment of the 21 district court is hereby AFFIRMED. 22 23 FOR THE COURT: 24 Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk 25 26 2