(PC) Williams v. Alcala, 1:17-cv-00916-DAD-SAB (PC). (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180111947
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT [ECF No. 25] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Robert C. Williams is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This action is proceeding for monetary damages against Defendants Alcala and Garza for the use of excessive force Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of default, filed January 5, 2018. On December 15, 2017, the Court issued an order fo
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT [ECF No. 25] STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Robert C. Williams is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. This action is proceeding for monetary damages against Defendants Alcala and Garza for the use of excessive force Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of default, filed January 5, 2018. On December 15, 2017, the Court issued an order for..
More
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT
[ECF No. 25]
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Robert C. Williams is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding for monetary damages against Defendants Alcala and Garza for the use of excessive force
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of default, filed January 5, 2018.
On December 15, 2017, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why entry of default should not be entered against Defendants Gerardo Alcala and Stephen Garza. On December 15, 2017, Defendants Alcala and Garza filed an answer to the complaint. Therefore, on December 21, 2017, the Court vacated the December 15, 2017 order to show cause. Accordingly, because Defendants have answered the complaint, Plaintiff's motion for entry of default is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
