ORDER1

SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.

Before the Court is United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 35), recommending that Plaintiff Ferrara Candy Company's Motion for Attorney's Fees and Costs Pursuant to Judgment and Permanent Injunction of Doc. 33 (Doc. 34) be granted in part. No party has objected to the Report and Recommendation, and the period to do so has lapsed. This matter is ripe for review.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). Absent specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, and the court may accept, reject, or modify the findings in whole or in part. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even with no objection. Cooper-Houston v. Southern Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994).

Here, Judge McCoy recommends that Ferrara Candy be awarded its requested attorneys' fees and costs, subject to the following: (1) reduction of attorney hourly rates to $425; (2) reduction of paralegal hourly rates to $175; (3) reduction of the hours billed by 15% to offset the effects of block billing; and (4) deduction of pro hac vice fees. After independently examining the file and on consideration of Judge McCoy's findings and recommendation, the Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

United States Magistrate Judge Mac R. McCoy's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 35) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED.

DONE and ORDERED.