Estate of Rahim v. U.S., 1:18-cv-11152-IT. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20190227d82
Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . The Court having been apprised that the United States Attorney has certified that defendant John Doe 1 was acting within the scope of his federal employment at the time of the incidents giving rise to Counts I, II, IV, and V of the Amended Complaint, and the Court having been apprised of the substitution o fthe United States as the defendant on those counts under 28 U.S.C. 2679(d)(1): It is hereby ORDERED that Counts I, II, IV, and V are dismissed
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . The Court having been apprised that the United States Attorney has certified that defendant John Doe 1 was acting within the scope of his federal employment at the time of the incidents giving rise to Counts I, II, IV, and V of the Amended Complaint, and the Court having been apprised of the substitution o fthe United States as the defendant on those counts under 28 U.S.C. 2679(d)(1): It is hereby ORDERED that Counts I, II, IV, and V are dismissed ..
More
ORDER
INDIRA TALWANI, District Judge.
The Court having been apprised that the United States Attorney has certified that defendant John Doe 1 was acting within the scope of his federal employment at the time of the incidents giving rise to Counts I, II, IV, and V of the Amended Complaint, and the Court having been apprised of the substitution o fthe United States as the defendant on those counts under 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(1):
It is hereby ORDERED that Counts I, II, IV, and V are dismissed as against John Doe 1, and the United States is substituted as the defendant in his place for those counts.
Source: Leagle
