Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Uniloc 2017 LLC. v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., 3:18-cv-06737-JST (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190416b21 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 15, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2019
Summary: CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME & ORDER THEREON JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs, Uniloc 2017 LLC, Uniloc USA, Inc., and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (together, "Uniloc") and Defendants LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics, Inc. (together, "LGE"), hereby stipulate as follows: WHERAS, LGE filed its response to Uniloc's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Compla
More

CIVIL LOCAL RULE 6-2 JOINT STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME & ORDER THEREON

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs, Uniloc 2017 LLC, Uniloc USA, Inc., and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. (together, "Uniloc") and Defendants LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., and LG Electronics, Inc. (together, "LGE"), hereby stipulate as follows:

WHERAS, LGE filed its response to Uniloc's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint on April 5, 2019;

WHEREAS, Uniloc's Reply in Support of its Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint is due on April 12, 2019;

WHEREAS, James J. Foster, Uniloc's lead counsel, has been out of the office April 9-12 attending depositions in another matter;

WHEREAS this would be the first extension in this case regarding this motion;

WHEREAS, a three day enlargement of Uniloc's time to file its Reply in support of its motion to April 15, 2019 will not impact any hearing or proceeding on the Court's calendar;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the forgoing, Uniloc and LGE stipulate, subject to the approval of the Court, that Uniloc's time to file its Reply in Support of its Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint be enlarged to and including April 15, 2019.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

IT IS SO ORDERED that the foregoing Agreement is approved.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer