U.S. EX REL. BUDIKE v. PECO ENERGY, 07-4147. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Number: infdco20150820b18
Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK , District Judge . AND NOW , this 18th day of August , 2015, upon consideration of Defendant PECO Energy's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 94), joined in by Defendant General Dynamics, American Overseas Marine ("AMSEA") (ECF No. 96), and all papers and exhibits submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED . JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants PECO Energy and AMSEA, and agai
Summary: ORDER R. BARCLAY SURRICK , District Judge . AND NOW , this 18th day of August , 2015, upon consideration of Defendant PECO Energy's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 94), joined in by Defendant General Dynamics, American Overseas Marine ("AMSEA") (ECF No. 96), and all papers and exhibits submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED . JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants PECO Energy and AMSEA, and again..
More
ORDER
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant PECO Energy's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 94), joined in by Defendant General Dynamics, American Overseas Marine ("AMSEA") (ECF No. 96), and all papers and exhibits submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Defendants PECO Energy and AMSEA, and against Plaintiff United States of America ex rel. Lothar E.S. Budike, Sr.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
