Filed: Jul. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2012
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the document filed by defendant Stanley Knight on July 27, 2012 [Docket No. 57], which the Court construes as a request to the Court. When a defendant is represented by counsel, this court will not accept pro se filings from that defendant. See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959 , 964, n.2 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Guadalupe, 979 F.2d 790 , 795 (10th Cir. 1992)), reviewed on other grounds,
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the document filed by defendant Stanley Knight on July 27, 2012 [Docket No. 57], which the Court construes as a request to the Court. When a defendant is represented by counsel, this court will not accept pro se filings from that defendant. See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959 , 964, n.2 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Guadalupe, 979 F.2d 790 , 795 (10th Cir. 1992)), reviewed on other grounds, ..
More
ORDER
PHILIP A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the document filed by defendant Stanley Knight on July 27, 2012 [Docket No. 57], which the Court construes as a request to the Court. When a defendant is represented by counsel, this court will not accept pro se filings from that defendant. See United States v. Nichols, 374 F.3d 959, 964, n.2 (10th Cir. 2004) (citing United States v. Guadalupe, 979 F.2d 790, 795 (10th Cir. 1992)), reviewed on other grounds, 543 U.S. 1113 (2005). In this case, the defendant is represented by counsel. As a result, defendant's pleading is improper. Therefore, it is
ORDERED that Docket No. 57 is STRICKEN.
