Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Walker v. Ruffin, 2:19-cv-147-KS-MTP. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20191113b34 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2019
Summary: AGREED ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR DIRECT NEGLIGENCE, AGAINST MERCER TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., WITHOUT PREJUDICE KEITH STARRETT , District Judge . COMES NOW, on the ore tenus motion of Plaintiff, with agreement and stipulation of Defendants, Robert D. Ruffin and Mercer Transportation Co., Inc., the Court hereby dismisses, without prejudice, the direct negligence claims against Mercer Transportation Co., Inc., as follows: 1. All claims against Mercer Transportation Co., Inc.,
More

AGREED ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS FOR DIRECT NEGLIGENCE, AGAINST MERCER TRANSPORTATION CO., INC., WITHOUT PREJUDICE

COMES NOW, on the ore tenus motion of Plaintiff, with agreement and stipulation of Defendants, Robert D. Ruffin and Mercer Transportation Co., Inc., the Court hereby dismisses, without prejudice, the direct negligence claims against Mercer Transportation Co., Inc., as follows:

1. All claims against Mercer Transportation Co., Inc., for direct negligence and liability, including negligent entrustment, training, supervision, and retention, which are contained in Paragraph 15 of the Plaintiff's Complaint are dismissed without prejudice.

2. Nothing in this order impacts Plaintiff's remaining claim of negligence against Robert D. Ruffin or the claim against Mercer Transportation Co., Inc. based on vicarious liability.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that all direct liability claims against Mercer Transportation Co., Inc. are dismissed without prejudice as set forth above. All other claims against the Defendants remain unaffected.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer