HANSEN v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., CIV-17-513-D. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Number: infdco20170622f28
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI , District Judge . The parties to this action have filed an Agreed Motion [Doc. No. 10], asking that the Court stay these proceedings pending the resolution of two related cases currently before the Court: Wells v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-17-46-D and Higginbotham v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-17-102-D (hereinafter the " Wells/Higginbotham litigation"). 1 Rather than staying this case for an indete
Summary: ORDER TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI , District Judge . The parties to this action have filed an Agreed Motion [Doc. No. 10], asking that the Court stay these proceedings pending the resolution of two related cases currently before the Court: Wells v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-17-46-D and Higginbotham v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-17-102-D (hereinafter the " Wells/Higginbotham litigation"). 1 Rather than staying this case for an indeter..
More
ORDER
TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge.
The parties to this action have filed an Agreed Motion [Doc. No. 10], asking that the Court stay these proceedings pending the resolution of two related cases currently before the Court: Wells v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-17-46-D and Higginbotham v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc., et al., Case No. CIV-17-102-D (hereinafter the "Wells/Higginbotham litigation").1
Rather than staying this case for an indeterminate amount of time, the Court directs the Clerk to administrative close this case in her records. Within thirty (30) days of the final disposition of the Wells/Higginbotham litigation, the parties may move to reopen this action. If the parties have not moved to reopen this action within the prescribed time, it will be deemed to be dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The parties also request that the Consolidated Complaint filed in the Wells/Higginbotham litigation [Doc. No. 15] be designated as the operative complaint in this action. The Court declines to do so at this time.
Source: Leagle
