Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TAYLOR v. KONDAUR CAPITAL CORPORATION, 2:14-cv-704-FtM-38CM. (2015)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20150304b59 Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff, Brenda Taylor and the Defendant, Kondaur Capitol Corporation's Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice ( Doc. #12 ) filed on February 23, 2015. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. The Rule reads in pertinent part: Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may d
More

ORDER1

This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff, Brenda Taylor and the Defendant, Kondaur Capitol Corporation's Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. #12) filed on February 23, 2015. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A), allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case without a court order. The Rule reads in pertinent part:

Subject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) A notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) A stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A).

In this instance, the Plaintiff informs the Court that she voluntarily dismisses the Complaint with prejudice. Therefore, the case is due to be dismissed with prejudice.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Plaintiff, Brenda Taylor and the Defendant, Kondaur Capitol Corporation's Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (Doc. #12) is GRANTED. The case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer