Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Wright v. Mecum Auction Inc., 2:17-cv-02217-APG-NJK. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171215d17 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . The presumptively reasonable discovery period is 180 days calculated from the first defendant's appearance. Local Rule 26-1(b)(1). Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan seeking a discovery period of 322 days. Docket No. 24. The Court finds insufficient justification has been provided for such an extensive discovery period. Nonetheless, given the recent appearance by Defendant's counsel on November 22, 2017, the Court will allow a 1
More

ORDER

The presumptively reasonable discovery period is 180 days calculated from the first defendant's appearance. Local Rule 26-1(b)(1). Pending before the Court is the parties' discovery plan seeking a discovery period of 322 days. Docket No. 24. The Court finds insufficient justification has been provided for such an extensive discovery period. Nonetheless, given the recent appearance by Defendant's counsel on November 22, 2017, the Court will allow a 180-day discovery period calculated from that date. Accordingly, the discovery plan is DENIED with respect to the deadlines proposed and the Court instead SETS deadlines as follows:

• Amend pleadings/add parties: February 20, 2018 • Initial experts: March 22, 2018 • Interim status report: March 22, 2018 • Rebuttal experts: April 20, 2018 • Discovery cutoff: May 21, 2018 • Dispositive motions: June 20, 2018 • Joint proposed pretrial order: July 20, 2018, or 30 days after decision on any dispositive motions

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer