Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Baylor v. Saul, 2:19-cv-00231-JAD-GWF. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20190626d20 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM AND/OR RESPOND TO PLAINITFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND. (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from June 24, 2019 to July 24, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM AND/OR RESPOND TO PLAINITFF'S MOTION FOR REMAND.

(First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that the time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand be extended from June 24, 2019 to July 24, 2019. This is Defendant's first request for extension. Good cause exists to grant Defendant's request for extension. In the last two months, Counsel for Defendant (Counsel) had four family tragedies, including the loss of her cousin, his wife, an uncle and a close family friend. Due to the back-to-back deaths, Counsel took time off to attend out of town funeral and prayer services. Counsel also has taken additional leave to care for her elderly mother, who became ill and required surgery in mid-May and had another follow-up surgery in June, with additional follow-up appointments. In addition, Counsel also has over 100+ active social security matters, which require two or more dispositive motions until mid-September. As such, Counsel needs additional time to adequately review the transcript and properly respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand. The parties further stipulate that the Court's Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. Defendant makes this request in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Counsel apologizes for the belated request, but made her request as soon as reasonably practicable following her leave.

Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted, Dated: June 24, 2019 /s/Cyrus Safa (*as authorized by email on June 24, 2019) CYRUS SAFA Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: June 24, 2019. NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH United States Attorney DEBORAH LEE STACHEL Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration By /s/Tina L. Naicker TINA L. NAICKER Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer