FRANK v. HOPE HOSPICE & COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC., 2:13-cv-642-FtM-38UAM. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20140521b06
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 20, 2014
Latest Update: May 20, 2014
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on review of the docket. This matter was dismissed without prejudice and closed. ( See Doc. #17 ). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. DONE and ORDERED FootNotes 1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are caution
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on review of the docket. This matter was dismissed without prejudice and closed. ( See Doc. #17 ). Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. DONE and ORDERED FootNotes 1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautione..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on review of the docket. This matter was dismissed without prejudice and closed. (See Doc. #17).
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.
Source: Leagle
