Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WIAND v. MEEKER, 8:10-CV-166-T-17MAP. (2013)

Court: District Court, M.D. Florida Number: infdco20130705998 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 14, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2013
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK A. PIZZO, Magistrate Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Receiver's motion for taxation of costs (doc. 147). Since Defendant Brian L. Meeker, as Trustee for the Brian L. Meeker Trust has failed to object to the bill of costs taxed by this Court on April 15, 2013, within the time set forth in my previous order dated April 12, 2013 (doc. 152), the Court assumes that Defendant has no objection to the entry of an order awarding the Receiver its costs incurr
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MARK A. PIZZO, Magistrate Judge.

THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the Receiver's motion for taxation of costs (doc. 147). Since Defendant Brian L. Meeker, as Trustee for the Brian L. Meeker Trust has failed to object to the bill of costs taxed by this Court on April 15, 2013, within the time set forth in my previous order dated April 12, 2013 (doc. 152), the Court assumes that Defendant has no objection to the entry of an order awarding the Receiver its costs incurred in this matter.1 Accordingly, it is hereby

RECOMMENDED:

1. The Receiver's motion to tax costs (doc. 147) be GRANTED. 2. Defendant be directed to pay to the Receiver $2,360.05 for the taxable costs it incurred in this matter.

IT IS SO REPORTED.

FootNotes


1. Although Rule 54(d)(1) directs the Defendant to file objections to the Clerk's taxation of costs within seven (7) days, I granted Defendant's motion for extension of time (doc. 148) and directed Defendant to file objections to the Clerk's taxation of costs within thirty (30) days. See Order, doc. 152.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer