Vega v. Secretary, Doc, 2:11-cv-413-FtM-38CM. (2018)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20180227893
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 26, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Walter Vega's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis ( Doc. 117 ) filed on February 20, 2018. As noted in the first three denials of Petitioner's motions ( Doc. 99 ; Doc. 109 ; Doc. 111 ), any appeal by Petitioner would not be taken in good faith under rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate procedure because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of t
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Walter Vega's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis ( Doc. 117 ) filed on February 20, 2018. As noted in the first three denials of Petitioner's motions ( Doc. 99 ; Doc. 109 ; Doc. 111 ), any appeal by Petitioner would not be taken in good faith under rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate procedure because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of th..
More
OPINION AND ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Walter Vega's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 117) filed on February 20, 2018. As noted in the first three denials of Petitioner's motions (Doc. 99; Doc. 109; Doc. 111), any appeal by Petitioner would not be taken in good faith under rule 24(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate procedure because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the deprivation of any federal constitutional right. Thus, Petitioner is not entitled to appeal as a pauper.
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
Petitioner Walter Vega's Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 117) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or websites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other websites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their websites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their websites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source: Leagle
