Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Berlin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-893V. (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20191120b46 Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On June 22, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a right shoulder injury that was caused by an influenza ("flu") vaccination in her right deltoid on September 16, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Off
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On June 22, 2018, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a right shoulder injury that was caused by an influenza ("flu") vaccination in her right deltoid on September 16, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On August 22, 2019, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for her shoulder injury. On September 9, 2019, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating petitioner should be awarded $110,000.00. Proffer at 1-2. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Id. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $110,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Candace M. Berlin. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION1

I. Procedural History

On June 22, 2018, Candace Berlin ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation ("petition") under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34, as amended. She alleges that, as a result of receiving the influenza vaccine on September 16, 2016, she suffered from a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration ("SIRVA"). Petition. On August 19, 2019, respondent filed his Vaccine Rule 4(c) report, conceding SIRVA as a Table injury. On August 22, 2019, the Chief Special Master issued a ruling on entitlement, finding that petitioner was entitled to compensation for SIRVA.

II. Items of Compensation

Based upon the evidence of record, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded a lump sum of $110,000.00, for all damages, with the full amount being for pain and suffering, paid in the form of a check to petitioner. This amount represents all elements of compensation to which petitioner would be entitled under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Petitioner agrees.

III. Form of the Award

Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to petitioner should be made through a lump sum payment of $110,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner.2 Petitioner agrees.

Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/Jeffrey T. Sprague JEFFREY T. SPRAGUE Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U. S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146, Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, D.C. 20044-0146 Direct dial: (202) 616-4179 Dated: September 9, 2019 Fax: (202) 616-4310

FootNotes


1. The undersigned intends to post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. This Proffer does not include attorneys' fees and costs, which the parties intend to address after the Damages Decision is issued.
2. Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering, and the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer