Zarandioun v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, 2:14-cv-00008. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20141110923
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2014
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE DISCOVERY PLAN/SCHEDULING ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and LR 6-2 VICTORIA F. ZARANDIOUN ("Plaintiff") respectfully makes this unopposed motion requesting a thirty (30) day extension to file the Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Currently, the Parties are scheduled to submit their Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order on November 10, 2014. The grounds for the motio
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE DISCOVERY PLAN/SCHEDULING ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and LR 6-2 VICTORIA F. ZARANDIOUN ("Plaintiff") respectfully makes this unopposed motion requesting a thirty (30) day extension to file the Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Currently, the Parties are scheduled to submit their Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order on November 10, 2014. The grounds for the motion..
More
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE DISCOVERY PLAN/SCHEDULING ORDER (FIRST REQUEST)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and LR 6-2 VICTORIA F. ZARANDIOUN ("Plaintiff") respectfully makes this unopposed motion requesting a thirty (30) day extension to file the Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Currently, the Parties are scheduled to submit their Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order on November 10, 2014. The grounds for the motion are as follows:
New information has come to light regarding Plaintiff's case and undersigned counsel needs additional time to conduct further research, consult with the Plaintiff, and contact Plaintiff's previous legal counsel. The Parties are contemplating resolving this case without having to proceed to trial.
Undersigned counsel contacted opposing counsel, Mr. John Inkeles on November 4, 2014, who advised that he has no objection to the requested extension. This extension will prejudice neither party, but rather will facilitate the efficient disposition of this matter. Should such filing still be necessary, the Parties will comply no later than 5 p.m. EST, on December 10, 2014.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
