Filed: Aug. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (ECF No. 172) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiffs Newmark Group, Inc., G&E Acquisition Company LLC, and BGC Real Estate of Nevada, LLC ("Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, and Defendants Avison Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young (USA) Inc., Avison Young-Nevada LLC, Mark Rose, Joseph Kupiec, John Pinjuv, and The
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (ECF No. 172) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiffs Newmark Group, Inc., G&E Acquisition Company LLC, and BGC Real Estate of Nevada, LLC ("Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, and Defendants Avison Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young (USA) Inc., Avison Young-Nevada LLC, Mark Rose, Joseph Kupiec, John Pinjuv, and The N..
More
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (ECF No. 172)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1, Plaintiffs Newmark Group, Inc., G&E Acquisition Company LLC, and BGC Real Estate of Nevada, LLC ("Plaintiffs"), through their counsel of record, and Defendants Avison Young (Canada) Inc., Avison Young (USA) Inc., Avison Young-Nevada LLC, Mark Rose, Joseph Kupiec, John Pinjuv, and The Nevada Commercial Group ("Defendants"), through their respective counsel of record, hereby respectfully submit the following Stipulation and Proposed Order Extending the Briefing Schedule on Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses.
1. On July 26, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses. (ECF. No. 172).
2. Having conferred and agreed, the parties respectfully request that the Court set the following briefing deadlines with respect to Plaintiffs' motion:
a. Defendants shall have until August 21, 2018, to file a response in opposition to Plaintiffs' motion.
b. Plaintiffs shall have until August 28, 2018 to file a reply in support of their motion.
3. The parties further respectfully request that the Court schedule the hearing currently requested to a date after August 28, 2018.
ORDER
Having reviewed the foregoing stipulation and finding good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall file their response in opposition to Plaintiffs' motion by August 21, 2018, and Plaintiffs shall file their reply by August 28, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
