Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Shapiro v. United States, 19-846. (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20191021570 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER LOREN A. SMITH , Senior Judge . On June 6, 2019, Robert Shapiro, a pro se plaintiff, filed his Complaint with this Court. On August 2, 2019, defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). After Plaintiff failed to timely respond to defendant's Motion to Dismiss, on September 6, 2019, the Court issued an Order giving plaintiff an additional twenty-one days to file his Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Se
More

ORDER

On June 6, 2019, Robert Shapiro, a pro se plaintiff, filed his Complaint with this Court. On August 2, 2019, defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims ("RCFC"). After Plaintiff failed to timely respond to defendant's Motion to Dismiss, on September 6, 2019, the Court issued an Order giving plaintiff an additional twenty-one days to file his Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. See ECF No. 10. In that Order, the Court warned that if plaintiff failed to file his Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss on or before the extended deadline—September 27, 2019—plaintiff's Complaint would be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute under RCFC 41(b). Id.

To date, the Court has not received plaintiff's Response to defendant's Motion to Dismiss. As such, the Court has no choice but to DISMISS plaintiff's case without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to RCFC 41(b). The Clerk's Office is directed to enter judgment consistent with this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer