Filed: Oct. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Default (Doc. 4). Plaintiff "moves for the entry of a default against Defendant Chianta Lindsey ( Id. at p. 1). Plaintiff represents that "Coalition for the Homeless failed to file any paper on the undersigned, or file any paper in a timely manner as required by law" and that "Chianta Lindsey was served on May 27, 2015," but "[n]othing was received until July 2, 2015." ( Id. ). "When a party aga
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Default (Doc. 4). Plaintiff "moves for the entry of a default against Defendant Chianta Lindsey ( Id. at p. 1). Plaintiff represents that "Coalition for the Homeless failed to file any paper on the undersigned, or file any paper in a timely manner as required by law" and that "Chianta Lindsey was served on May 27, 2015," but "[n]othing was received until July 2, 2015." ( Id. ). "When a party agai..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Default (Doc. 4). Plaintiff "moves for the entry of a default against Defendant Chianta Lindsey (Id. at p. 1). Plaintiff represents that "Coalition for the Homeless failed to file any paper on the undersigned, or file any paper in a timely manner as required by law" and that "Chianta Lindsey was served on May 27, 2015," but "[n]othing was received until July 2, 2015." (Id.).
"When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party's default." FED. R. CIV. P. 55(a). Before the clerk may enter default, it must be determined that effective service has been made on the defaulting defendant because, without effective service, there is no jurisdiction and no obligation to answer or "otherwise defend." Kelly v. Florida, 233 F. App'x 883, 885 (11th Cir. 2007). The federal rules provide that service on an individual can be made by any manner accepted in the state where the district court is located1 or where service is made or by
(A) delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the individual personally; (B) leaving a copy of each at the individual's dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there; or (C) delivering a copy of each to an agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process.
FED. R. CIV. P. 4(e).
Plaintiff has not demonstrated effective service on Defendant Chianta Lindsey. Plaintiff's Affidavit of Service represents that the "corporate — registered agent" for "Chianta L. Lindsey Coalition for the Homeless, R/A Brent Trotter" was "served by delivering a true copy of the summons and complaint with exhibits . . . to Brent Trotter as Registered Agent" on May 27, 2015 (Doc. 1-4, p. 99 (emphasis omitted)). Chianta Lindsey is an advanced registered nurse practitioner who is apparently employed by Defendant Health Care Center for the Homeless, Inc.,2 and who provided care to Plaintiff (See Doc. 2). Nothing in the rules permits service on an individual by delivering a copy of the summons and complaint to the registered agent of the individual's corporate employer. The Court also notes that Plaintiff's Motion for Default was filed after Lindsey's counsel entered an appearance and moved for an extension of time to respond to the complaint (Doc. 1-4, pp. 132-36), Plaintiff's motion is not accompanied by a memorandum of supporting legal authority as required by M.D. FLA. R. 3.01(a), and Plaintiff filed an amended complaint after moving for an entry of default on the original complaint (Doc. 2). For all of these reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Default (Doc. 4) is DENIED.
DONE and ORDERED.
