Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Douse v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 17-771V. (2018)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20180601c33 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2018
Summary: UNPUBLISHED DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On June 12, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered she suffered Guillain-Barr syndrome (GBS) as a result of an influenza (flu) vaccine administered to her on October 3, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of t
More

UNPUBLISHED

DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES1

On June 12, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the "Vaccine Act"). Petitioner alleges that she suffered she suffered Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) as a result of an influenza (flu) vaccine administered to her on October 3, 2016. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 26, 2018, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation. On March 22, 2018, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation ("Proffer") indicating petitioner should be awarded $158,801.00, representing compensation for pain and suffering ($150,000.00), past unreimbursable expenses ($2006.00), and lost wages ($6,795.00). Proffer at 2. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. Based on the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner a lump sum payment of $158,801.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Tammy L. Douse. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a).

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

On June 12, 2017, Tammy Douse ("petitioner") filed a petition for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to -34 ("Vaccine Act" or "Act"), alleging that she suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome ("GBS") caused by an influenza ("flu") vaccine administered on October 3, 2016. Petition at ¶¶ 1. On February 23, 2018, the Secretary of Health and Human Services ("respondent") filed a Rule 4(c) Report indicating that this case is appropriate for compensation under the terms of the Act, and the Chief Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation on February 26, 2018. ECF No. 21; ECF No. 22.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that Tammy Douse should be awarded $150,000.00 in actual and projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner agrees.

B. Past Unreimbursable Expenses

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents Tammy Douse's expenditure of past unreimbursable expenses as a result of her vaccine injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $2006.00, as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(1)(B). Petitioner agrees.

C. Lost Wages

Evidence supplied by petitioner documents that Tammy Douse incurred lost wages and employer retirement contributions related to her vaccine injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded lost wages (after an offset for taxes) and retirement contributions in the amount of $6,795.00, as provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Petitioner agrees.

II. Form of the Award

Petitioner is a competent adult. Evidence of guardianship is not required in this case. Respondent recommends that the compensation provided to Tammy Douse should be made through a lump sum payment as described below and requests that the Chief Special Master's decision and the Court's judgment award the following1: a lump sum payment of $158,801.00, representing compensation for pain and suffering ($150,000.00), past unreimbursable expenses ($2006.00), and lost wages ($6,795.00), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Tammy Douse.

III. Summary of Recommended Payments Following Judgment

Lump sum payable to petitioner, Tammy Douse: $158,801.00 Respectfully submitted, CHAD A. READLER Acting Assistant Attorney General C. SALVATORE D'ALESSIO Acting Director Torts Branch, Civil Division CATHARINE E. REEVES Deputy Director Torts Branch, Civil Division ALEXIS B. BABCOCK Assistant Director Torts Branch, Civil Division /s/Julia M. Collison JULIA M. COLLISON Trial Attorney Torts Branch, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 146 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044-0146 Tel: (202) 305-0102 Dated: March 22, 2018

FootNotes


1. Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.
2. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all "§" references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
3. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties' joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.
1. Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future lost earnings and future pain and suffering.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer