BERMINGHAM v. CITY OF CLERMONT, 5:12-cv-37-Oc-37TBS. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20120216e77
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2012
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants, City of Clermont and Steve Graham's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Deadline to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Expedited Ruling (Doc. 13). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), counsel for the defendants represents that the plaintiff's attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, the defendants' motion is
Summary: ORDER THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Defendants, City of Clermont and Steve Graham's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Deadline to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Expedited Ruling (Doc. 13). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), counsel for the defendants represents that the plaintiff's attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, the defendants' motion is ..
More
ORDER
THOMAS B. SMITH, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants, City of Clermont and Steve Graham's Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Deadline to File Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Request for Expedited Ruling (Doc. 13). Pursuant to Local Rule 3.01(g), counsel for the defendants represents that the plaintiff's attorney has been contacted and has no objection to the requested extension of time. Upon due consideration, the defendants' motion is hereby GRANTED. The defendants shall have through February 24, 2012 within to file their response to Petitioner's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Memorandum of Law (Doc. 2).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DONE AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
