Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ZTE USA Inc. v. AGIS Software Development LLC, 2:17-cv-00517-JRG) (E.D. Tex.). (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190624868 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 21, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 73) AND EXTEND ADR DEADLINE (DKT. 56) (As Modified) HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and the Court's Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73) and the Order re: ADR Deadline (Dkt. 56), Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. ("ZTE") and Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC ("AGIS Software") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree a
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER (DKT. 73) AND EXTEND ADR DEADLINE (DKT. 56)

(As Modified)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, and the Court's Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73) and the Order re: ADR Deadline (Dkt. 56), Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. ("ZTE") and Defendant AGIS Software Development LLC ("AGIS Software") (collectively, the "Parties"), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, on April 4, 2019, to allow sufficient time for the Parties to complete mediation, the Court granted the Parties' request to extend the ADR deadline from April 17, 2019 to June 21, 2019 (Dkt. 56);

WHEREAS, on April 15, 2019, the Court signed and entered an amended Scheduling Order (Dkt. 63), which modified the previous Scheduling Order (Dkt. 25);

WHEREAS, on May 17, 2019, to allow the Parties time to confer regarding the Parties' discovery disputes, the Court granted the Parties' request to extend Plaintiff's Invalidity Contentions and Plaintiff's Production from May 20, 2019 to June 3, 2019; and the Court granted the Parties' request to extend the Parties' Exchange of Proposed Claim terms from June 3, 2019 to June 10, 2019;

WHEREAS, the parties were scheduled to conduct mediation on June 4, 2019 with Hon. James Ware (Ret.) as mediator, however, due to a medical emergency of mediator, the Parties were unable to complete mediation on that date;

WHEREAS, the next available date for both Parties and the mediator is in August 2019, which is after the current June 21, 2019 ADR mediation deadline;

WHEREAS, to allow sufficient time for the Parties to complete the rescheduled mediation, the Parties have agreed that good cause exists to extend the ADR deadline to August 23, 2019;

WHEREAS, on June 14, 2019, the Parties met and conferred in Magistrate Judge Spero's courtroom to discuss certain discovery disputes;

WHEREAS, to allow the Parties time to resolve such discovery disputes as agreed during the meet and confer, the Parties have agreed that good cause exists to extend the discovery deadlines as described below;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the upcoming deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order (Dkt. 73) be modified as follows:

Event Previous Dates Amended Dates Exchange Preliminary Claim June 24, 2019 August 2, 2019 Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence Damages Contentions July 1, 2019 August 9, 2019 Joint Claim Construction and July 3, 2019 August 13, 2019 Prehearing Statement Exchange Expert Declarations July 3, 2019 August 13, 2019 in Support of Claim Construction, if Any Responsive Damages July 29, 2019 September 6, 2019 Contentions Complete Claim Construction August 5, 2019 September 13, 2019 Discovery Submit Opening Claim August 20, 2019 September 30, 2019 Construction Brief Submit Responsive Claim September 3, 2019 October 14, 2019 Construction Brief Submit Reply Claim September 10, 2019 October 21, 2019 Construction Brief Claim Construction Hearing October 2, 2019; 1:00 p.m. November 12, 2019; 1:00 p.m.

IT IS FURTHER HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective undersigned counsel, that the deadline to complete ADR, currently set for June 21, 2019 (Dkt. 56), shall be continued to August 23, 2019.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

Dated: June 19, 2019 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Michael Liu Su Michael Liu Su (Cal. Bar No. 300590) michael.liu.su@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 Lionel M. Lavenue (pro hac vice) lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com Bradford C. Schulz (pro hac vice) bradford.schulz@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 Telephone: (571) 203-2700 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Attorneys for Plaintiff ZTE (USA) Inc. Dated: June 19, 2019 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Sarah G. Hartman Sarah G. Hartman (Cal. Bar No. 281751) shartman@brownrudnick.com Alfred R. Fabricant (pro hac vice) afabricant@brownrudnick.com Peter Lambrianakos (pro hac vice) plambrianakos@brownrudnick.com Vincent J. Rubino, III (pro hac vice) vrubino@brownrudnick.com Brown Rudnick LLP 7 Times Square New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 209-4800 Facsimile: (212) 209-4801 Arjun Sivakumar (Cal. Bar No. 297787) asivakumar@brownrudnick.com Brown Rudnick LLP 2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor Irvine, California 92612 Telephone: (949) 752-7100 Facsimile: (949) 252-1514 Attorneys for Defendant AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LLC

ATTESTATION

I, Michael Liu Su, hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other Signatories indicated by a confirmed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

/s/Michael Liu Su Michael Liu Su

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, except the claim construction hearing will be held on November 20, 2019 at 1:00 p.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer