UNIVERSITAS EDUCATION, LLC v. NOVA GROUP, INC., 11 Civ. 1590 (LTS)(HBP) (2014)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20140619b51
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. The parties are directed to be prepared to discuss the scope of the Court's authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69 and N.Y. C.P.L.R. 5225(b), particularly with respect to third parties who are no longer in possession of assets transferred from a judgment debtor; the parties will be expected to address this in connection with the holdings in Peacock v. Thomas, 516 U.S. 349 , 357 (1996); Epperson v. Entm't Express, Inc., 242 F.3d 100 ,
Summary: ORDER LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge. The parties are directed to be prepared to discuss the scope of the Court's authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69 and N.Y. C.P.L.R. 5225(b), particularly with respect to third parties who are no longer in possession of assets transferred from a judgment debtor; the parties will be expected to address this in connection with the holdings in Peacock v. Thomas, 516 U.S. 349 , 357 (1996); Epperson v. Entm't Express, Inc., 242 F.3d 100 , (..
More
ORDER
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, District Judge.
The parties are directed to be prepared to discuss the scope of the Court's authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69 and N.Y. C.P.L.R. 5225(b), particularly with respect to third parties who are no longer in possession of assets transferred from a judgment debtor; the parties will be expected to address this in connection with the holdings in Peacock v. Thomas, 516 U.S. 349, 357 (1996); Epperson v. Entm't Express, Inc., 242 F.3d 100, (2d Cir. 2001); Estate of Ungar v. Orascom Telecom Holding S.A.E., 578 F.Supp.2d 536, 547 (S.D.N.Y. 2008); and Alliance Bond Fund, Inc. v. Grupo Mexicano De Desarrollo, 190 F.3d 16, 21 (2d Cir. 1998).
The parties are directed to be prepared to discuss whether personal jurisdiction must be established with respect to each third-party respondent against whom or which relief is sought, and the method(s) by which such respondents were served.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
