Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, 3:09-md-02100-DRH-PMF (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20150323844 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID R. HERNDON , District Judge . On February 20, 2015, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of diversity jurisdiction noting that the plaintiff and defendant Bayer Corporation are both citizens of Indiana. On March 9, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss her claims against non-diverse defendant Bayer corporation. On March 11, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal without prejudice. Thereafter, the Court recognized the stipulation of dismissal and
More

ORDER

On February 20, 2015, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of diversity jurisdiction noting that the plaintiff and defendant Bayer Corporation are both citizens of Indiana. On March 9, 2015, the plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss her claims against non-diverse defendant Bayer corporation. On March 11, 2015, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal without prejudice. Thereafter, the Court recognized the stipulation of dismissal and closed the action.

Closing the case was in error. The parties only stipulated to the dismissal of defendants Bayer Corporation and Bayer HealthCare LLC. Accordingly, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to re-open the case and to terminate defendants Bayer Corporation and Bayer HealthCare LLC from the docket. Further, the Court notes the dismissal of the non-diverse defendant, Bayer Corporation, moots the motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and the plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant Bayer Corporation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer