BLICK v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 12-1431. (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20120814137
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2012
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kathleen Blick and Harold Blick appeal the district court's order granting Defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss their action to quiet title in real property. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants' brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blick v. We
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kathleen Blick and Harold Blick appeal the district court's order granting Defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss their action to quiet title in real property. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants' brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blick v. Wel..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kathleen Blick and Harold Blick appeal the district court's order granting Defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss their action to quiet title in real property. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellants' brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Blick v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No. 3:11-cv-00081-NKM-RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
