Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

IN RE BLOCK v. COLVIN, 4:16-cv-02381-KAW. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170118b53 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME KANDIS A. WESTMORE , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court as evidenced below, that the Plaintiff's time for responding to Defendant's Answer be extended from January 11, 2017 to March 13, 2017. This is Plaintiff's second request for an extension of time. Plaintiff requires this extension because Plaintiff wis
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, and with the permission of the Court as evidenced below, that the Plaintiff's time for responding to Defendant's Answer be extended from January 11, 2017 to March 13, 2017. This is Plaintiff's second request for an extension of time. Plaintiff requires this extension because Plaintiff wishes to discontinue representation by the Homeless Action Center and seek alternative legal counsel. This extension is requested to enable Ms. Block time to find other representation.

The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines set forth in the Court's Procedural Order for Social Security Review Actions shall be extended accordingly.

The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer