Filed: Feb. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION JUDITH C. HERRERA , District Judge . On May 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this Court seeking review of the Social Security Administration's decision to deny Plaintiff benefits. Doc. 1. Following a stipulated remand to Defendant for further administrative action in January 2015, the case was reopened on February 24, 2017. Docs. 22, 23, 26, 30. On July 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION JUDITH C. HERRERA , District Judge . On May 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this Court seeking review of the Social Security Administration's decision to deny Plaintiff benefits. Doc. 1. Following a stipulated remand to Defendant for further administrative action in January 2015, the case was reopened on February 24, 2017. Docs. 22, 23, 26, 30. On July 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand t..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION
JUDITH C. HERRERA, District Judge.
On May 27, 2014, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in this Court seeking review of the Social Security Administration's decision to deny Plaintiff benefits. Doc. 1. Following a stipulated remand to Defendant for further administrative action in January 2015, the case was reopened on February 24, 2017. Docs. 22, 23, 26, 30.
On July 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Remand to Agency or Reverse (doc. 42) the Social Security Administration's adverse decision that Plaintiff's disability and entitlement to benefits ended in January 2011. That motion was fully briefed on September 27, 2017. See docs. 42, 44, 45. On January 29, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed his Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (PFRD), in which he recommended denying Plaintiff's Motion and affirming the Commissioner's decision. Doc. 46. Neither party has filed objections to the PFRD, and, upon review of the record, I concur with the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendations.
Wherefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition (doc. 46), is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion is DENIED and this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
