Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 18-649V. (2019)

Court: United States Court of Federal Claims Number: infdco20190819614 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: UNPUBLISHED RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1 NORA BETH DORSEY , Chief Special Master . On May 8, 2018, Kimberly J. Little 2 filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. 300aa-10, et seq., 3 (the "Vaccine Act"). The Petition alleges that Ms. Little suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome ("GBS") as a result of her October 15, 2015 influenza ("flu") vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of
More

UNPUBLISHED

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On May 8, 2018, Kimberly J. Little2 filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,3 (the "Vaccine Act"). The Petition alleges that Ms. Little suffered Guillain-Barre Syndrome ("GBS") as a result of her October 15, 2015 influenza ("flu") vaccination. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On May 22, 2019, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent's Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer on Award of Compensation at 2. Specifically, respondent indicates that

[m]edical personnel at DICP have reviewed the Petition and medical records filed in this case. Based on that review, DICP has concluded that Ms. Little suffered from GBS as set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table ("Table") and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation ("QAI"). The evidence shows that petitioner suffered GBS following the administration of an influenza vaccine, and that the onset occurred within the time period specified in the Table. 42 C.F.R. §§ 100.3(a), (c)(15). In addition, petitioner suffered the residual effects of her condition for more than six months. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-11(c)(1)(D)(i). Therefore, based on the record as it now stands, petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Act. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-13.

Id. at 2-3.

In view of respondent's position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).
2. Subsequently, by Order dated September 7, 2018, the undersigned granted petitioner's motion to substitute Kellie Brown as petitioner in this case. (ECF No. 21).
3. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer