U.S. v. Vavrina Investments, LLC, 17-10662. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20170726i04
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2017
Summary: ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . This is a lien enforcement action that involves collection of IRS tax claims against Marc S. Drouillard. On July 13, 2017 the government filed a suggestion of bankruptcy due to the filing of a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code by Marc S. Drouillard and his wife Teresa L. Drouillard. Bankr. No. 17-46247 (Bankr. E.D. Mich). Mr. Drouillard is not a party to the above-captio
Summary: ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING GEORGE CARAM STEEH , District Judge . This is a lien enforcement action that involves collection of IRS tax claims against Marc S. Drouillard. On July 13, 2017 the government filed a suggestion of bankruptcy due to the filing of a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code by Marc S. Drouillard and his wife Teresa L. Drouillard. Bankr. No. 17-46247 (Bankr. E.D. Mich). Mr. Drouillard is not a party to the above-caption..
More
ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING
GEORGE CARAM STEEH, District Judge.
This is a lien enforcement action that involves collection of IRS tax claims against Marc S. Drouillard. On July 13, 2017 the government filed a suggestion of bankruptcy due to the filing of a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code by Marc S. Drouillard and his wife Teresa L. Drouillard. Bankr. No. 17-46247 (Bankr. E.D. Mich). Mr. Drouillard is not a party to the above-captioned case, and the property subject to this action no longer belongs to Mr. Drouillard. However, the government filed notices of federal tax liens when Mr. Drouillard owned the property and there is an issue in the pending action whether the tax liens have been released. Now, therefore;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is closed for administrative purposes without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this closing does not constitute a dismissal or a decision on the merits.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that when the Bankruptcy Case has been resolved, this case may be reopened on motion of any party.
Source: Leagle
