Filed: May 22, 2018
Latest Update: May 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Defendants, OMICS GROUP INC., IMEDPUB LLC, CONFERENCE SERIES LLC, and SRINUBABU GEDELA, by and through counsel of record, D. Neal Tomlinson and Kristina R. Kleist, and Plaintiff, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, by and through counsel of record, Gregory A. Ashe and Michael E. Tankersley, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. On May 1, 2018, Plaintiff filed its Motion to for Summary Judgment
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Defendants, OMICS GROUP INC., IMEDPUB LLC, CONFERENCE SERIES LLC, and SRINUBABU GEDELA, by and through counsel of record, D. Neal Tomlinson and Kristina R. Kleist, and Plaintiff, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, by and through counsel of record, Gregory A. Ashe and Michael E. Tankersley, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. On May 1, 2018, Plaintiff filed its Motion to for Summary Judgment,..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINE
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
Defendants, OMICS GROUP INC., IMEDPUB LLC, CONFERENCE SERIES LLC, and SRINUBABU GEDELA, by and through counsel of record, D. Neal Tomlinson and Kristina R. Kleist, and Plaintiff, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, by and through counsel of record, Gregory A. Ashe and Michael E. Tankersley, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On May 1, 2018, Plaintiff filed its Motion to for Summary Judgment, (Dkt. No. 86).
2. Defendants also filed their Motion for Summary Judgment on May 1, 2018 (Dkt. No. 89).
3. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is quite extensive, being over 50 pages itself and referencing 27 exhibits, including a declaration with exhibits of over 1,000 pages.
4. Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Compel on May 9, 2018 (Dkt. Nos. 92, 94).
5. Defense counsel has still been dealing with pressing family medical issues which has continued to require counsel to be out of the office, and additional time is needed to confer with Defendants and respond to Plaintiff's Motions.
6. Plaintiff's counsel has agreed to extend the May 22, 2018 response date to the Motion for Summary Judgment and the May 23, 2018 response date for the Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Compel to June 1, 2018.
7. This Stipulation is being made in good faith between and at the request of both parties, and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the deadline for both parties to file their respective responses to the Motions for Summary Judgment is hereby extended to June 1, 2018. Additionally, Defendants shall have until June 1, 2018 to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions and Motion to Compel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
