Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 30, 2018. ECF No. 94. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections the
Summary: ORDER M. CASEY RODGERS , District Judge . This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 30, 2018. ECF No. 94. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections ther..
More
ORDER
M. CASEY RODGERS, District Judge.
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated May 30, 2018. ECF No. 94. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. Defendants' motions to dismiss, ECF Nos. 78, 80, 81, and 82, are GRANTED and plaintiff's claims against Escambia County, Florida; Steven Barry; David Morgan; Todd Gerald Glaze; Harry Green; and Patricia A. Kinsey are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
3. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings against Ms. Cosby, ECF No. 67, is DENIED and plaintiff's claims against Ms. Cosby are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
4. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment against Judge Kinsey, ECF No. 71, is DENIED.
5. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.
6. The clerk of court shall close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED.
