Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

TIBCO Software Inc. v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, 19-cv-01163-MMC. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190925a94 Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CIGNA'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS SECOND AMENDED ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND COUNTERCLAIMS; DIRECTIONS TO CIGNA Re: Dkt. No. 67 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court is defendant Connecticut General Life Insurance Company's ("Cigna") Administrative Motion, filed September 13, 2019, "to File Under Seal its Second Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims," 1 whereby Cigna seeks to file under seal material it ha
More

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CIGNA'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS SECOND AMENDED ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND COUNTERCLAIMS; DIRECTIONS TO CIGNA

Re: Dkt. No. 67

Before the Court is defendant Connecticut General Life Insurance Company's ("Cigna") Administrative Motion, filed September 13, 2019, "to File Under Seal its Second Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims,"1 whereby Cigna seeks to file under seal material it has designated confidential. Having read and considered the motion and the declaration filed in support thereof, the Court rules as follows:

Cigna seeks to file under seal portions of its Second Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims, as well as the entirety of Exhibits A, B, C, D, and E thereto.

Good cause appearing, the motion to seal is hereby GRANTED, and no further action need be taken with respect to the sealing of said material. Cigna is, however, hereby DIRECTED to submit to the Court, in single-sided format and no later than September 30, 2019, a freestanding chambers copy of the unredacted version of its Second Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The chambers copy of the above referenced motion was submitted in double-sided format and consequently not in compliance with the Civil Local Rules of this District and this Court's Standing Orders. See Civil L.R. 3-4(c)(2) ("Text must appear on one side only[.]"); see also Standing Orders for Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2 (providing chambers copies "shall be submitted...in single-sided format"). Nonetheless, the Court has accepted, on this occasion, the chambers copy.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer