RAULERSON v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 2:14-cv-268-FtM-38CM. (2015)
Court: District Court, M.D. Florida
Number: infdco20150107735
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Matthew Raulerson and Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice ( Doc. #23 ) filed on December 29, 2014. Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case voluntarily without a court order. Rule 41(a)(1)(A) reads, in pertinent part, that [s]ubject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the
Summary: ORDER 1 SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Matthew Raulerson and Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice ( Doc. #23 ) filed on December 29, 2014. Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case voluntarily without a court order. Rule 41(a)(1)(A) reads, in pertinent part, that [s]ubject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the p..
More
ORDER1
SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Matthew Raulerson and Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #23) filed on December 29, 2014. Rule 41(a)(1)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a plaintiff to dismiss a case voluntarily without a court order. Rule 41(a)(1)(A) reads, in pertinent part, that
[s]ubject to Rules 23(e), 23.1, 23.2 and 66 and any applicable federal statute, the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) A notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) A stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A).
Here, Plaintiff and Defendant have settled this matter, and stipulate and request that this Court dismiss this action with prejudice, each party to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. (Doc. #23). Both parties have signed the stipulation. (Doc. #23). The Court thus dismisses this case with prejudice under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
Accordingly, it is now
ORDERED:
(1) Plaintiff Matthew Raulerson and Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #23) is GRANTED.
(2) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and close the file.
DONE and ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Disclaimer: Documents filed in CM/ECF may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. These hyperlinks are provided only for users' convenience. Users are cautioned that hyperlinked documents in CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By allowing hyperlinks to other Web sites, this Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the Court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The Court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the Court.
Source: Leagle
